Accessibility Tools

Select your language

UN Updates

Our strategic presence in Geneva sets us apart as the sole NGO exclusively committed to economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights. This permits us to play a pivotal role in promoting and protecting these rights globally.
GI-ESCR elected to the Steering Committee
Featured

GI-ESCR elected to the Steering Committee

GI-ESCR elected to the Steering Committee of the Extra-Territorial Obligations Consortium

 

The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR) was elected by its peers to join the Steering Committee of the Extra-Territorial Obligations Consortium.  The GI-ESCR is pleased to join its colleagues and partners who also have been elected to the Steering Committee and looks forward to contributing to guiding the ETO Consortium in the coming years, including following up on the detailed recommendations arrived at during the Consortium's recent meeting in Geneva. The ETO Consortium is a network of leading human rights organizations, university institutes, civil society organizations and institution-based individuals.  Its purpose is to address the current shortcomings of human rights interpretation in a globalization context by mainstreaming states’ extraterritorial obligations.

The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has been a member of the ETO Consortium since the GI-ESCR's founding and provides expertise to the Consortium’s IFI and Development Cooperation Focal Group as well as on strategic litigation.

For more information on the work of the GI-ESCR in this area see HERE.

For detailed information on Extra-Territorial Obligations and human rights see:

Maastricht Principles on Extra-Territorial Obligations and the Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extra-Territorial Obligations

Also see the FIAN flyer on ETOs HERE.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

Urgent call to action on the human rights to water and sanitation
Featured

Urgent call to action on the human rights to water and sanitation

GI-ESCR joins Urgent Call to Action on the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation

 

The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has joined WASH United and twenty-one other organization to urgently call on States to renew previous commitments to the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation in the outcome document of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. 

We are deeply concerned that the current draft of the outcome document departs from commitments that virtually all States have already made. In 2010, the UN General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council recognized that the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation is part of international human rights law.  In May 2011, the World Health Assembly, where all UN Member States are represented, adopted by consensus a resolution which included the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation.

As the third round of ‘informal-informal’ negotiations of the Rio+20 outcome document is under discussion in New York, we call on all States to demonstrate again the political consensus that has already been achieved.  We urgently call upon States to use the following language in the Rio+20 outcome document:

The Paragraph “Water 1” of the outcome document should read as follows:

“We recognize the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation as a human right that is essential for the full enjoyment of life and all human rights.  We commit to the progressive realization of universal access to safe drinking water and sanitation for all.  In this regard, we reaffirm our commitment to increase access to safe drinking water and sanitation in  accordance with our goal to halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation.  We also reaffirm our commitment to the 2005-2015 International Decade for Action “Water for Life”.”

The new proposed paragraph on a target for achieving universal access to water and sanitation should read as follows:

“By 2030, achieve access to safe and affordable drinking water and sanitation for all, without discrimination, in sufficient quantities to protect human health and dignity, particularly for the most marginalized.”

The outcome document of the Rio+20 Conference will shape the future direction of development at all levels.  It is uncontested that access to safe drinking water and sanitation is a fundamental pre-condition for overall sustainable development.  In Rio, States have the opportunity to take a big step towards realizing the vision of safe drinking water and sanitation for all people - particularly the poorest and most marginalized - by integrating the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation into the outcome document.  Without this step,  international efforts to achieve sustainable development will risk failure.

UPDATE: Rio+20: Canada, Last Holdout, Drops Opposition to Water as Human Right

 

New ESCR-Net Publication: Seeding Hope?
Featured

New ESCR-Net Publication: Seeding Hope?

New ESCR-Net Publication: Seeding Hope? Land in the International Human Rights Agenda

 

ESCR-Net is pleased to announce the publication of "Seeding Hope? Land in the International Human Rights Agenda: Challenges and Prospects," developed together with the International Council on Human Rights Policy.

This paper was developed in response to a mandate that grew out of a gathering of ESCR-Net’s Social Movements Working Group in Brazil in 2010, where participants called on the Network to explore ways to reinforce and advance efforts to strengthen an international recognition of human rights to lands and territories.  It highlights several issues that are currently being explored by the human rights community with regards to land and explores some possible approaches going forward.  With a particular focus on the need to understand and elevate the demands of social movements, the paper recommends some principles to guide work toward a collaborative human rights agenda on land.

The findings reflect a broad range of informal consultations with a large number of ESCR-Net members, including in a meeting held in Geneva in September.  ESCR-Net is particularly grateful to six members who served as expert readers prior to the paper’s publication: Bret Thiele (The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), Fernando Gallardo Viera Prioste (Terra de Direitos), Jill-Carr Harris (Ekta Parishad), Magdalena Sepulveda (International Council on Human Rights Policy), Sandra Ratjen (International Commission of Jurists) and Sofia Monsalve (FIAN).

The publication will be available in other languages soon at ESCR-Net.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

Holding the World Bank Accountable for Human Rights Violations
Featured

Holding the World Bank Accountable for Human Rights Violations

Guatemala: Holding the World Bank Accountable for Human Rights Violations

 

The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR) together with Rights Action and the International Human Rights Clinic at Western New England University School of Law has filed a Petition before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in an attempt to hold the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) accountable for human rights violations that occurred during the construction of the Chixoy hydroelectric dam in Guatemala. In May 2012, the same organizations filed a Supplemental Brief to the Inter-American Commission that addressed various admissibility issues including jurisdiction over the Member States of the World Bank and IDB that have human rights obligations within the inter-American human rights system.

Several Maya Achi villages were forcibly evicted, some through a series of brutal massacres, to make way for the construction of the Chixoy Dam in the 1980s.  The case highlights the complicity of international financial institutions (IFIs), in particular the World Bank and the IDB, in the brutal removal of indigenous communities from their lands in Guatemala.

According to Grahame Russell, Co-Executive Director of Rights Action, “Almost 30 years after the so-called completion of the Chixoy Dam project, no reparations or compensation have been provided, whatsoever, to the thousands of Maya Achi families, from 32 communities, whose lives and livelihoods were illegally harmed and destroyed.”

Bret Thiele, Co-Executive Director of the GI-ESCR, said that “Several States that make up the decision-making bodies at the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank have human rights obligations under the inter-American human rights system, including extra-territorial obligations, and there is sound legal foundation for holding them accountable for their roles in the egregious human rights violations that occurred during their management of the Chixoy dam project.”

While attempting to hold IFIs accountable for human rights violations before regional human rights mechanisms is novel, the case is grounded in the International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations as well as the recently adopted Maastricht Principles on Extra-Territorial Obligations.  As the Petition argues, the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank are made up of States, all of which have human rights obligations.  These States should not be able to ignore, or indeed violate, these obligations simply by organizing themselves into international financial institutions or by using those institutions as agents to carry out policies or practices that violate their respective international human rights obligations.

Grahamme Russell added that the Petition would be supported by a grassroots effort to hold the Banks accountable as well as to ensure that the Inter-American Commission exercises its authority to hold Member States of the OAS that sit on the decision-making bodies of the Banks accountable for human rights violations.

View the Petition (Request for Appeal) to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights HERE.

View the Supplemental Brief to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights HERE.

NOTE:  The Petition is an appeal of an earlier case brought before the Inter-American Commission and includes updated factual information and legal analysis. 

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

Threatened forced eviction of the the Dobri Jeliazkov community
Featured

Threatened forced eviction of the the Dobri Jeliazkov community

Threatened forced eviction of the the Dobri Jeliazkov community (Sofia, Bulgaria)

 

The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR), along with its Bulgarian partner Equal Opportunities Association (EOA), represent the Dobri Jeliazkov community in Sofia, Bulgaria in their struggle to prevent the forced eviction of their community. The Dobri Jeliazkov community consists of impoverished Roma and has been in existence for over 70 years.  

Currently 34 individuals live in the community, 15 of whom are minor children.  The Dobri Jeliazkov community faced imminent forced eviction and destruction of their homes in July 2011, when the GI-ESCR and EOA launched a case before the Human Rights Committee that resulted in the first ever Interim Measures by the Committee to prevent a forced eviction.  Until last month, those Interim Measures had been effective.  That case, Ms. Naidenova et al. v. Republic of Bulgaria, Communication No. 2073/2011, is still pending.

Now, in an attempt to forcibly evict the Dobri Jeliazkov community, on 29 April 2012 the Municipality of Sofia had the water company, Sofiyska voda, cut off the water supply to the Dobri Jeliazkov community.  The community now has no access to running water.  The GI-ESCR urgently notified the Human Rights Committee of the situation as well as the Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, the Special Rapporteur on the rights to water and sanitation, the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, and the Independent Expert on Minority Issues requesting that they intervene with the Republic of Bulgaria and urge it to abide by its obligations to protect and to ensure the human rights of the Dobri Jeliazkov community, including by directing the relevant authorities, including the Municipality of Sofia and the water company, Sofiyska voda, immediately to reconnect access to water for the Dobri Jeliazkov community.

For more information, including relevant case filings, see HERE.

Those who want to protest these latest human right violations can direct letters to:

Sofia  Municipality

Yordanka Fandakova, Mayor of Sofia

Street "Moskovska" No 33

1000 Sofia

Bulgaria

 

Commission for Protection against Discrimination

Kemal Eub, Chairperson

bul. “Dragan Tsankov “ 35

1125 Sofia

Bulgaria

UPDATE:

On 9 May 2012 the Human Rights Committee intervened with the Government of Bulgaria and reminded it "not to evict Ms. Liliana Naidenova et a.l., and not to demolish their dwellings, while their case is under consideration by the Committee."  The Committee also stated that "While Ms. Liliana Naidenova et al. have not been forcibly evicted, cutting off the water supply to the Dobri Jeliazkov community could be considered an indirect means of achieving eviction."  The Committee consequently called upon the Government of Bulgaria to ensure that the water supply be re-established to the Dobri Jeliazkov community.

Accountability to extraterritorial human rights obligations
Featured

Accountability to extraterritorial human rights obligations

GI-ESCR advocates for accountability to extra-territorial human rights obligations

 

The GI-ESCR intervened with a Parallel Report to the Human Rights Committee regarding violations of Germany's extra-territorial obligation to protect human rights by not regulating or holding accountable a German corporation involved in forced evictions in Uganda. The report covers the forced eviction of the villages of Kitemba, Luwunga, Kijunga and Kirymakole in the Mubende District of Uganda that were carried out in 2001 on behalf of the Neumann Kaffee Gruppe to make way for a coffee plantation. 

The Report concludes that Germany violated its extra-territorial obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to protect human rights by failing to regulate Neumann Kaffee Gruppe and for failing to investigate and appropriately sanction Neumann Kaffee Group for its complicity in the forced evictions.  To date those evicted continue to live in extreme poverty due to their forced eviction and have been unable to realize their right to a remedy in either Uganda or Germany.

Read the Parallel Report HERE.

For more information on the Mubende forced eviction see FIAN Background information HERE.

New Resource on Women’s Housing
Featured

New Resource on Women’s Housing

New Resource on Women’s Housing, Land, and Property Rights in the Context of HIV

 

"TOOLS FOR CHANGE: Applying United Nations standards to secure women’s housing, land, and property rights in the context of HIV" seeks to empower advocates working in the context of HIV by making the relevant United Nations standards and interpretations clear and accessible. This new resource provides advocates with a better understanding of international human rights and government obligations, in order to ensure government accountability and advancement of women’s housing, land, and property rights.

The Manual is an easy to use resource of international human rights tools for advocates working on women’s housing, land, and property rights in the context of HIV. It brings together the relevant international human rights documents and highlights core concepts, rights, and means of enforcement, providing examples of successful advocacy from around the world. Moreover, it draws on the voices of women, gathered through a series of focus-group discussions in different countries, to explain these rights and their uses in practical terms.

 

GI-ESCR joins submission to OHCHR on Business and Human Rights
Featured

GI-ESCR joins submission to OHCHR on Business and Human Rights

GI-ESCR joins submission to OHCHR on Business and Human Rights

 

The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR) has joined a submission to the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The submission, jointly sent by members of the World Bank and Human Rights Affinity Group, addresses business and human rights in the context of World Bank activities. The full text of the submission follows below.

March 28, 2012

Lene Wendland Research and Right to Development Division Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights CH-1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland.

Re: Submission for Report on Business and Human Rights and the UN System

Dear Ms. Wendland:

We welcome the opportunity to provide input to the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General’s report regarding how the UN system can contribute to the advancement of the business and human rights agenda and the implementation of the “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' Framework.” The undersigned organizations encourage the Secretary-General to address in his report the role the World Bank Group (WBG) should play as a specialized agency of the UN, according to agreements concluded in 1948 and 1961, in supporting the implementation of the Guiding Principles and the underlying UN Framework, as one component of broader efforts to advance compliance with human rights standards.

The WBG should recognize the need to act in a manner consistent with the three pillars of the UN’s “Protect, Respect and Remedy” human rights framework, including as elaborated in the Guiding Principles. Governments’ obligations to respect human rights include the obligation to protect against human rights abuses by third parties. This is particularly relevant to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA), which engage with, and are governed by, sovereign governments. In addition, the corporate responsibility to respect all human rights is of special significance for the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), which engage the private sector. It is particularly important that the WBG, in its activities, uphold the third pillar of the UN Framework, regarding access to justice for victims of human rights abuses. The WBG should ensure that its response to the findings of its accountability mechanisms provide concrete redress for communities.

The WBG is well positioned to raise awareness about the Guiding Principles and UN Framework and to secure their implementation. It could do this by adopting environmental and human rights policies that are aligned with the international human rights obligations of its member states and clients. Unfortunately, the current policies of the WBG do not meet these standards. There will be an opportunity later this year to address this and effectively integrate the UN Guiding Principles and Framework on Business and Human Rights and relevant international human rights instruments when IBRD and IDA review eight of their safeguard policies, together with its policy on the use of country systems to address environmental and social safeguard issues.

Current IBRD and IDA policies do not ensure a robust due diligence process to identify potential human rights impacts or address them. The nine policies included in the review are:  environmental assessment, natural habitats, pest management, Indigenous Peoples, physical cultural resources, involuntary resettlement, forests, dam safety, and use of country systems. Although many of the policies implicate human rights, only two are considered by the World Bank to address “social issues.” The Indigenous Peoples policy is the only one that explicitly mentions human rights. However, this policy does not reflect the full extent of the rights of indigenous peoples, as enshrined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The policies of IBRD and IDA presently do not address a range of major human rights issues such as labor rights, non-discrimination, the rights of disabled persons, or women’s rights, and there is no overarching human rights policy, like the environmental assessment policy, which would require clients to conduct a human rights impact assessment.

An added layer of complexity is that even as the WBG reviews these policies, they apply to fewer of IBRD and IDA’s activities. Increasingly, IBRD and IDA are failing to assume their responsibility to prevent negative impacts from the projects and programs they finance through new approaches to lending, including Development Policy Loans (DPLs). As indicated in the Guiding Principles, host governments have the duty to respect human rights and to protect against violations committed by corporations, but we believe that that should be in addition to, and not a substitution for, the international human rights obligations of the member states of the WBG. As recognized in the Commentary to the Guiding Principles, “States retain their international human rights law obligations when they participate in such [international trade and financial] institutions.” In addition, the Maastricht Principles on Extra-Territorial Obligations provide useful interpretative support to the Guiding Principles, and the ETO Principles clarify that a state must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the relevant organization acts consistently with the international human rights obligations of that state.

The private sector lending arm of the WBG—IFC and MIGA—is bound by a separate set of environmental and social policies, the Policy and Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability. The Policy outlines the responsibilities of the IFC and MIGA, and the eight Performance Standards describe the requirements for their clients.

The IFC recently concluded a multi-year review of the Policy and Performance Standards in January 2012. Although the new framework adopts some human rights language, including a requirement for free, prior and informed consent for projects affecting indigenous peoples, it falls short of what would be required by international human rights norms. For example, the new framework does not require its clients to undertake a human rights impact assessment, stating only that it might be “appropriate” in limited high risk circumstances. Performance Standard 1 admits that due diligence against the other Performance Standards will allow IFC/MIGA’s clients to address many, but not all, human rights issues. By contrast, the Commentary to the Guiding Principles is quite clear on this point: “While processes for assessing human rights impacts can be incorporated within other processes such as risk assessments or environmental and social impact assessments, they should include all internationally recognized human rights as a reference point, since enterprises may potentially impact virtually any of these rights.” The WBG’s failure to require a human rights impact assessment is despite the fact that the IFC has prepared a guide to human rights assessment and management. Similar to IBRD and IDA, IFC is also distancing itself from responsibility for the impacts of the projects it finances through the use of financial intermediaries. The IFC applies a different and less rigorous set of standards to financial intermediaries, which, in turn, finance projects that could have comparable impacts to projects the IFC finances directly.

The WBG has unfulfilled potential to support the human rights obligations of its member states and clients. One significant obstacle in realizing its potential is the reticence on the part of the member states, usually represented by the finance minister, to discuss human rights. Another challenge is to raise awareness among the 10,000 employees of the WBG. Some progress has been made within the institution to educate staff about the potential human rights impacts of the WBG’s operations through the work of the Nordic Trust Fund, but substantially more needs to be done. We urge the Secretary-General, in his report, to call on the WBG to fulfill its potential and ensure that its policies are consistent with the Guiding Principles, the UN Framework and international human rights standards.

If we can provide any additional information, please contact Kris Genovese (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) at the Center for International Environmental Law or Leonardo Crippa (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) at the Indian Law Resource Center.

Sincerely,

Amnesty International Bank Information Center, USA Center for Human Rights and Environment (CEDHA), Argentina Center for International Environmental Law, USA Corporate Accountability International, USA Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Human Rights Watch Indian Law Resource Center, USA International Accountability Project, USA International Trade Union Confederation/Global Unions, Belgium Urgewald, Germany International Human Rights Clinic, Western New England University School of Law, USA

International Women’s Day: Defending Women’s Land Rights in Sri Lanka
Featured

International Women’s Day: Defending Women’s Land Rights in Sri Lanka

International Women’s Day: Defending Women’s Land Rights in Sri Lanka

 

7 March 2012

This International Women’s Day, the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights joined with ActionAid, CARE International, Estate Community Development Mission, Law & Society Trust, Muslim Women’s Research and Action Forum, Oxfam Australia, Praja Abhilaasha Network and Women & Media Collective, issuing a public appeal for women’s land rights in Sri Lanka. The following ad appeared in 9 newspapers across Sri Lanka, in English, Sinhala and Tamil.

The recent review (2011) of Sri Lanka by the UN Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women highlighted the importance of these issues, and provided important recommendations which now need to be followed up on by civil society actors and implemented by State authorities.  There, the CEDAW Committee urged Sri Lanka to:

(a) Abolish the concept of "head of household" in administrative practice and recognize joint or co-ownership of land; and

(b) Speedily amend the Land Development Ordinance in order to ensure that joint or co-ownership be granted to both spouses when the State allocates land to married couples.

While these Concluding Observations are very important and useful from an advocacy perspective, little awareness exists among civil society, the donor community and others working in development initiatives on the CEDAW process and the Concluding Observations that are issued by the CEDAW Committee at the culmination of the State review, a situation which must be remedied. We hope that this International Women’s Day you will join us in our call to let gender equality take root in Sri Lanka!

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
Image

Select your language

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.