Accessibility Tools

Select your language

UN Updates

Our strategic presence in Geneva sets us apart as the sole NGO exclusively committed to economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights. This permits us to play a pivotal role in promoting and protecting these rights globally.
Working Paper - UN Pronouncements on Extra-Territorial Obligations
Featured

Working Paper - UN Pronouncements on Extra-Territorial Obligations

Updated Working Paper - Human Rights Law Sources: UN Pronouncements on Extra-Territorial Obligations

 

Extra-territorial obligations (ETOs) are increasingly recognized as essential to ensuring a global framework built on human rights.  As a consequence, civil society is demanding that ETOs be applied through human rights monitoring, enforcement, accountability and remedial mechanisms, resulting in a growing body of pronouncements enforcing ETOs in practice. This Working Paper, updated November 2015, outlines the application of extra-territorial obligations (ETOs) by United Nations mechanisms, including the Concluding Observations of Treaty Bodies, General Comments and Recommendations adopted by Treaty Bodies, and within the work of UN Special Procedures including Special Rapporteurs and Independent Experts appointed by the Human Rights Council.  As such, it provides a current understanding of how ETOs are monitored and enforced by UN human rights mechanisms.

The Working Paper is available HERE.

ESCR Update from Geneva: 30th session of the UN Human Rights Council
Featured

ESCR Update from Geneva: 30th session of the UN Human Rights Council

ESC Rights Update from Geneva: 30th session of the UN Human Rights Council, Fall 2015

 

September 2015

The 30th session of the Human Rights Council dealt with ESC and related rights issues such as: enforced or involuntary disappearances and economic, social and cultural rights; safe drinking water and sanitation; the education of girls; hazardous substances and wastes; indigenous peoples; capacity-building in public health against pandemics; human rights of peasants and persons working in rural areas; and the right to development.

We thank Alissa Noemie Ghils for her great work in assisting the Global Initiative for ESCR at the 30th session of the Human Rights Council and for authoring this version of our periodic Update from Geneva.

For a detailed report on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights at the 30th session of the Human Rights Council see here.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

Opportunities to enforce corporate accountability
Featured

Opportunities to enforce corporate accountability

Opportunities to enforce corporate accountability: enforcing extra-territorial obligations

 

Originally published by the International Service for Human Rights

Article disponible en français ici.

Lea este artículo en español aquí.

Geneva – By Bret Thiele, Co-Executive Director of the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which undertakes advocacy in the area of extra-territorial human rights obligations.

Corporations and other business enterprises have a substantial impact on the world in which we live, including on human rights.  According to the World Bank, in 2012, 63 per cent of the 175 largest global economic entities were corporations, and corporate activities have impact on human rights around the globe.  Consequently, human rights defenders have increasingly focused on developing tactics, strategies and mechanisms to hold corporate actors accountable to human rights obligations.

This advocacy has resulted in the human rights framework addressing this reality, including with two key initiatives.  The first is the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights framework.  The second is the move to a legally binding human rights treaty on corporate actors, an initiative which has emerged from strong civil society engagement.  Both show various degrees of promise, but both also have drawbacks.  The Guiding Principles are unfortunately crafted more as a corporate social responsibility framework rather than corporate accountability framework, as they are voluntary in nature, and they don’t apply the current comprehensive body of international law to corporate activity.  And, while the process towards a legally binding treaty is welcomed and much needed, it will be some time before such a treaty is adopted and enters into force.

Fortunately, there presently is another means of holding corporate actors accountable by using the existing human rights framework, namely by holding States accountable to their respective obligations to protect human rights by directly regulating corporations and providing accountability and remedial mechanisms when those corporations do violate human rights.  While the obligation to protect is well entrenched in the context of corporate activities at the domestic level, increasingly the extra-territorial obligation (ETO) to protect is being used to hold transnational corporations accountable for human rights impacts abroad.

Particularly driven by human rights defenders and civil society, the United Nations treaty bodies, those Committees mandated to monitor compliance with human rights treaties, have begun to seriously apply the extra-territorial obligation to protect human rights in the context of corporations and other business entities.  For instance, building on earlier pronouncements, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which monitors compliance with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted its clearest articulation on the ETO to protect in the context of corporate accountability, expressing its concern “about the lack of adequate and effective measures adopted by the State party to ensure that Chinese companies, both State-owned and private, respect economic, social and cultural rights, including when operating abroad” and recommending that China:

(a)      Establish a clear regulatory framework for companies operating in the State party to ensure that their activities promote and do not negatively affect the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural human rights; and

(b)       Adopt appropriate legislative and administrative measures to ensure legal liability of companies and their subsidiaries operating in or managed from the State party’s territory regarding violations of economic, social and cultural rights in their projects abroad.

The Human Rights Committee, which monitors compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, has also enforced ETOs in this context. For instance it recently adopted Concluding Observations on Canada in which it expressed its concern “about allegations of human rights abuses by Canadian companies operating abroad … and about the inaccessibility to remedies by victims of such violations.”  The Committee also regretted “the absence of an effective independent mechanism with powers to investigate complaints alleging abuses by such corporations that adversely affect the enjoyment of the human rights of victims, and of a legal framework that would facilitate such complaints.”  The Committee went on to recommend that Canada “a) enhance the effectiveness of existing mechanisms to ensure that all Canadian corporations, in particular mining corporations, under its jurisdiction respect human rights standards when operating abroad; b) consider establishing an independent mechanism with powers to investigate human rights abuses by such corporations abroad; c) and develop a legal framework that affords legal remedies to people who have been victims of activities of such corporations operating abroad.”

The challenge now for human rights defenders is to keep this momentum going and to leverage these pronouncements with national level advocacy in order to achieve real positive change on the ground.  Also, however, a concerted advocacy push should include the ETO to fulfill rights, by ensuring that corporate actors not only refrain from rights violations, but are required to ensure that their activities, including activities abroad, further the enjoyment of human rights around the globe.

For a comprehensive collection of UN pronouncements on extra-territorial obligations, including from treaty bodies, see the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Working Paper on UN Pronouncements on ETOs.

Additionally, the recent publication entitled Global Economy, Global Rights: A practitioners’ guide for interpreting human rights obligations in the global economy by ESCR-Net provides an examination of the application of ETOs by UN mechanisms.

- See more at: http://www.ishr.ch/news/opportunities-human-rights-defenders-enforce-corporate-accountability-enforcing-extra#sthash.pCEWsd7H.GsZ6fOyu.dpuf

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

Civil Society call for Gender Balance on CESCR
Featured

Civil Society call for Gender Balance on CESCR

Civil Society call for Gender Balance on Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

 

Today the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Programme on Women's Economic, Social and Cultural Rights were joined by 18 other civil society organizations in calling on Geneva and New York Missions to support gender balance and expertise in women's economic, social and cultural rights on the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Currently the membership of the Committee consists of 15 men and 3 women.  This is concerning because it provides a poor example of gender balance in an important human rights body and it highlights a systemic problem in surfacing, pursuing and promoting highly qualified female candidates for membership to the Committee.  It is also clearly inconsistent with the human rights principles of nondiscrimination and equality between men and women, which are enshrined in the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of all the major international human rights treaties including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

As mentioned above, the letter also calls for the support of candidates with established track records on women’s economic, social and cultural rights.  This is crucial as today women represent approximately 70% of the 1.2 billion people living in poverty throughout the world and violations of women's economic, social and cultural rights contributes substantially to the continuing subordination of women.

Finally, the letter urges that all members of the Committee be independent of States and impartial in their Committee work.

The full letter can be read HERE.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

Historic ruling on Spain related to the right to housing
Featured

Historic ruling on Spain related to the right to housing

UN Committee on ESC Rights issues historic ruling on Spain related to the right to housing

 

Via ESCR-Net

On September 17, 2015, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) published its first recommendations in response to an individual complaint, regarding a violation of the right to housing, under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (OP-ICESCR), taking into account an ESCR-Net intervention.

With its entry into force in May 2013, the OP-ICESCR gave the CESCR the ability to hear complaints from individuals or groups of individuals who have not been able to secure justice for violations of economic, social and cultural rights (ESCR) in their own country. This case sets an important precedent, representing a vital new opening for access to justice at the international level, following the advocacy of the NGO Coalition for the Ratification of the OP-ICESCR.

In I.D.G. v. Spain (Communication 2/2014), brought on behalf of the complainant by FR Abogados, the CESCR established that the State has the obligation to provide for effective remedies in foreclosure procedures related to defaulting on mortgage payments, to ensure that all appropriate measures are taken to guarantee personal notification in foreclosure procedures, and to guarantee that legislative measures are adopted to prevent repetition of similar violations in the future.

The Committee ruling is in line with the third party intervention, presented by the International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ESCR-Net) through members of its Strategic Litigation Working Group - the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR), the Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR), and the Social Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) - referencing established principles and relevant interpretation of such principles through international and comparative case law and other sources. It stressed that States parties must interpret and apply domestic law consistent with their obligations under the ICESCR and must ensure effective judicial protection for Covenant rights, including the right to adequate housing. The latter protection entails state obligations to consider all feasible alternatives to eviction, ensure the greatest possible security of tenure, provide for adequate and reasonable notice in cases of eviction, ensure that evictions do not render persons vulnerable to other human rights violations, and provide adequate compensation for violations.  In accepting this intervention from ESCR-Net, GI-ESCR, CESR and SERI, the Committee has followed the practice set by other international and regional decision-making bodies in allowing for third party interventions which present material relevant to the issues at stake.

This case arises in circumstances of widespread threats to the right to housing, impacting large numbers of people in Spain, who lost their homes after defaulting on mortgage payments in the context of the country’s economic recession and substantial unemployment.  In this regard, an estimated 400,000 mortgage foreclosures took place in Spain between 2008 and 2012.[1]  In 2014, six million people were unemployed in Spain. Moreover, between 2010 and 2014, the national budget for housing decreased by 47%, according to official figures.[2]

This case represents an important opening for justice for individuals and groups affected by ESCR violations; however, countries must first ratify the OP-ICESCR before their residents can access the CESCR using the mechanism of communications.  Civil society, foremost via the NGO Coalition for the OP-ICESCR coordinated by ESCR-Net, was central to the drafting and adoption of the OP-ICESCR, and the Coalition continues an active campaign encouraging countries to ratify and reinforce their existing human rights obligations by ensuring access to effective remedy.  As at today’s date, the following countries had ratified the OP-ICESCR: Argentina, Belgium, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cabo Verde, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Finland, France, Gabon, Italy, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Montenegro, Niger, Portugal, San Marino, Slovakia, Spain and Uruguay.

 

[1] Observatori DESC and Plataforma de los afectados por la hipoteca. Housing emergency in Spain. The crisis of foreclosures and evictions from a human rights perspective (2013). Available here.

[2] CESCR. Visualizing Rights Fact Sheet No. 14 – Spain (2014), available here

Honduras: Oppression against ESCR defenders must end
Featured

Honduras: Oppression against ESCR defenders must end

Honduras: Oppression against Economic, Social and Cultural Rights defenders must end

 

The specific and increasingly heightened risks facing defenders of economic, social and cultural rights in Honduras should be a priority issue during the country’s forthcoming examination by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, ISHR has said in a joint NGO report.

 

 

While all human rights defenders in Honduras are exposed to a wide range of obstacles and risks, those working on economic, social and cultural rights (land and environmental defenders in particular) are among the most vulnerable, shows the report on the situation of human rights defenders in Honduras. The research has been published jointly by ISHR, the International Platform against Impunity and the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR).

Violence and pressure are used on a regular basis to impede their work and silence them, which includes:

  • Death threats and murders

  • Forced evictions

  • Arbitrary detention and fraudulent charges

  • Administrative restrictions against the right to assembly

  • Public stigmatisation and defamation

  • Enforced disappearances

These attacks carried out in a climate of complete impunity have severely damaged the space for civil society activism regularly deprived of its most vocal representatives and haunted by the fear of reprisals.

The 56th Pre-sessional Working Group of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural will consider the joint submission in developing a list of issues to be posed to Honduras at its next examination. The aim of the review will be to assess Honduras’ progress towards compliance with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Dangers escalate for economic, social and cultural rights defenders

Despite the development of some encouraging laws, policies and actions by the authorities towards better protection of defenders, much more is required to ensure their full implementation while ‘a series of laws still restrict the rights to freedoms of assembly and association,’ says Ben Leather, ISHR Advocacy and Communications Manager.

‘It is clear that this group represents some of the human rights defenders who are most vulnerable in Honduras, given that they face a broad range of threats from a broad range of actors,’ he says. ‘The government must take steps to recognise their important role in ensuring economic development benefits communities and respects human rights, whilst protecting them against any reprisals for their activism.’

The Pre-sessional Working Group of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights must ask Honduras to detail the legal and practical steps it intends to take in order to ensure effective protection of economic, social and cultural rights defenders and combat impunity.

Lucy McKernan, Geneva Representative for GI-ESCR said: 'We hope the Committee will emphasise that inherent in the economic, social and cultural rights of Honduran citizens are the rights to participate in decisions that affect them, to critique government policy and advocate for changes in relation to those rights, without fear of harassment or reprisals.’

For more information, contact Ben Leather at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

- See more at: http://www.ishr.ch/news/honduras-oppression-against-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-defenders-must-end#sthash.TdbqihTZ.dpuf

Angola: Law should not be an instrument to stifle ESCR defenders
Featured

Angola: Law should not be an instrument to stifle ESCR defenders

Angola: Law should not be an instrument to stifle Economic, Social and Cultural Rights defenders

 

In a joint report sent to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the GI-ESCR and ISHR shed light on the judicial pressure and other means used by the Angolan Government to silence defenders.

 

 

The report published by ISHR and the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR) on the situation of human rights defenders in Angola reveals the particularly fragile situation of economic, social and cultural rights defenders in Angola and the recurrent misuse of judicial instruments and procedures by Government authorities to hamper and even block their action.

An increasingly restrictive legal environment and arbitrary application of the law combine to make the working context for human rights defenders in general, and economic, social and cultural rights defenders in particular, both unsafe and disempowering. This includes:

  • Arbitrary arrests and detention

  • Judicial harassment, abusive lawsuits and sentences

  • Legal restrictions to freedom of association

  • Purposely long and complex registration process for NGOs

  • Intimidation and violence by police officers

  • Defamation and criminalisation of defenders

  • Ban threats for organisations and defenders setting up protests

Journalists reporting on economic, social and cultural rights and defenders demanding transparency and disclosing governmental corruption  are among the most exposed to these violations.

The 56th Pre-sessional Working Group of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights will consider the joint submission by ISHR and the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in developing a list of issues to be posed to Angola at its next examination. The aim of the review will be to assess Angola’s progress towards compliance with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Warning lights on for civil society freedoms

In a latest move to keep watch over civil society organisations, the Government recently used counter terrorism as a pretext to enact a presidential decree that made it almost impossible for NGOs to carry out a wide range of procedures such as receiving foreign funding or acquiring legal personality. As for activists, those ‘defending labour rights and the right to housing, health, development and public participation in the context of business operations, face both restrictions in terms of access to information and transparency, as well as attacks and criminalisation in response to their work’, underlines Ben Leather, ISHR Advocacy and Communications Manager.

Lucy McKernan, Geneva Representative for GI-ESCR explained that ‘the effective protection and realisation of economic, social and cultural rights relies upon the valuable contribution of civil society, by monitoring and evaluating State compliance with the Covenant, providing input into policy formulation and program design and holding decision-makers accountable.  States must ensure that civil society can play this vital role,  and can voice their critiques of government action without fear of reprisals.’

The Pre-sessional Working Group of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights must therefore ask Angola to indicate what legal and policy steps it intends to take in order to relax undue governmental oversight and de facto restrictions imposed on civil society action.

For more information, contact Ben Leather at  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

- See more at: http://www.ishr.ch/news/angola-law-should-not-be-instrument-stifle-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-defenders#sthash.YZljk26n.dpuf

Responding to The Economist’s articles in support of private education
Featured

Responding to The Economist’s articles in support of private education

Responding to The Economist’s articles in support of private education: 7 letters from academics and NGOs

 

The 1st August 2015 edition of British weekly newspaperThe Economist  published two articles on the growth of private education in developing countries: “Learning Unleashed” and “The $1-a-week school”.  The articles purport the alleged benefits of the low-fee private school model. Both pieces came strongly in favour of private education, calling on governments to either help private schools or “get out of their way”. The articles generated a number of responses from organisations and individuals across the globe. A selection of these was published in the 22nd August edition’s Letters section, both in print and online, but not all responses were included.

Together with other organisations, we put together a short document collating the brief responses submitted to The Economist, including several that were not published. The document is available here http://bit.ly/1VX9LuW

It includes contributions from David Archer (ActionAid), Mark Goldring (Oxfam), Hugh McLean (Open Society foundation), Angelo Gavrielatos (Education International), Prachi Srivastava (University of Ottawa), Steven Klees (University of Maryland), and Sylvain Aubry (Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights).

An Essential Global Indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals
Featured

An Essential Global Indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals

Land Rights: An Essential Global Indicator for the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals

 

Secure land rights for all are a critical component of a transformational agenda of the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets. Leveraging decades of extensive expertise, a broad coalition of global and national organizations, civil society, and experts, including the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the Women’s Major Group (WMG), the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), recommends the following Land Rights Indicator.

Universal and feasible, this recommended land rights indicator is vital to four of the sustainable development goals, including ending poverty (goal 1), ensuring food security (goal 2), achieving gender equality and empowering women (goal 5), and making cities and human settlements inclusive (goal 11).1 This indicator, best placed under Target 1.4, would capture gender equality and progress of all people’s on-the-ground rights to land, property, and natural resources. This land rights indicator further aligns with priority indicators issued by the Global Land Indicators Initiative, and supported by the Global Donor Working Group on Land.

Recommended Land Rights Indicator: Percentage of women, men, indigenous peoples, and local communities (IPLCs) with secure rights to land, property, and natural resources, measured by:

a. percentage with legally documented or recognized evidence of tenure, and

b. percentage who perceive their rights are recognized and protected

The recommended indicator focuses on the twin aims of tracking legal and administrative progress by governments in recognizing secure rights to land (documentation) and of people-defined progress on the quality of land rights (perceptions). In doing so, this indicator fully tracks the agenda’s land rights content developed through months of inclusive negotiation and consultation and satisfies the request in the recently finalized UN declaration that global indicators maintain the level of ambition of the agenda (Para. 75).

The land rights indicator must capture the full scope of land rights included in the Post-2015 SDGs

Sustainable Development Goal 1 aims to “End poverty in all its forms everywhere.” One of the pillar targets to that end, Target 1.4, calls for “By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance.” This target encompasses all people regardless of where they reside, their livelihood activities, or the assets they own. It covers both social and economic resources.

a) The land rights indicator must capture more than agricultural land: Secure rights to land are key to accessing income, food, status, housing, credit, government services, and greater household- and community-level decision-making.

Indicators limited to agricultural land ignore the millions of women, men, indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) who live in the forest, practice nomadic or semi nomadic pastoralism, rely on plots too small to be considered agricultural holdings, live in rural areas but are not engaged in agricultural production, reside on communal land not designated for agricultural purposes, or rely on land for small businesses, as well as the urban and peri-urban poor.

b) The land rights indicator must extend beyond ownership: The indicator should use “tenure security,” a widely accepted concept that encompasses more than ownership and is in line with FAO’s Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure. Using “tenure security” (or “secure land rights”) terminology would protect the rights of those who access land through a number of group- or individually-held tenure arrangements. Indicators limited to those who “own” land ignore the millions:

• who live in countries, such as China and Vietnam, where the State owns all the land, and individuals have use rights. • who reside in regions across the world on communally-held land not individually-owned, such as areas under customary tenure in Sub-Saharan Africa, indigenous territories in Latin America, and Tribal communities in India. • who are unable to afford to own land but require secure use rights.

c) The land rights indicator must track both gender ratio and overall progress: Indicators limited to tracking the gender gap among those who have secure rights fail to consider the millions of women, men and IPLCs who do not have secure rights to land. The recommended land rights indicator would track both absolute improvement and reduced gender inequality.

A transformational agenda should seek new data and not be constrained by already available data

While critical to inform policy and to track progress, there is no globally available, nationally representative, sex-disaggregated data on land rights. Thus, any indicator on land rights will require new data collection efforts. The post-2015 agenda presents a historic opportunity to push the data and evidence base forward, rather than having the available data control the framing of priorities.

The recommended land rights indicator is feasible, even in the short term. For a description of how the data void can be addressed through global polls and household surveys click here.

For more information on the coalition’s proposal, click here. For questions or suggestions, please contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1 The cross-cutting nature of the recommended indicator, which can also track progress towards targets 2.3, 5.a and 11.1, makes it a powerful option if there is pressure to settle for a manageable set of indicators without sacrificing key components of the agenda.

The full statement along with sponsoring and endorsing organizations can be found HERE.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

 

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
Image

Select your language

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.